On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 5:43 PM, Hilaire Fernandes <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello Serge, > > Also we may want: > > - provide VM based on COG, the XO-1 are pretty slow, although XO 1.5 are > better.
Yes i was quite surprised the first time i used Squeak on XO-1. COG could definitively help here, but i have no competences in VM. > - propose a sugar theme for Pharo (it is about 70% complete with some issues > depending on Gary help) Great ! > - When Pharo is used to deploy application, what we should think about is > how to load fast Smalltalk code in an existing Pharo installation in the XO > notebook. You mean binary packages ? > I am pretty sure we can have quite visible and important impact! > > Nonetheless, an important argument we want to sell with such a set up: > "Develop there, deploy anywhere" > > > Geert, yes browser may not the easiest. We should iterate on how to improve > the IDE if we want kids to write in some way Smalltalk code. May be the > Workspace is more importante at the first place. At the beginning, we should hide Pharo environment and just use it to develop applications. Regards, -- Serge Stinckwich UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC), Hanoi, Vietnam Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk http://doesnotunderstand.org/ _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
