ok in 12039 I integrated 5 (or just the categorizer) and now I'm integrating the first mail which should be 10 I guess On Jul 7, 2010, at 7:41 PM, Pavel Krivanek wrote:
> Hi Stef, > > start with patch in comment 5 (reason in comment 2) and then with > comment 10 up to 19 (code/description) > > Cheers, > -- Pavel > > On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 7:05 PM, Stéphane Ducasse > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi Pavel >> >> where should I start? >> Because the changes you sent by emails are not in the same order than on the >> list? >> >> I was planning to start with the mail where you just uppercase the category? >> >> Stef >> >> On Jul 6, 2010, at 4:43 PM, Pavel Krivanek wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I finished the list of changes for the issue >>> http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=2635. >>> >>> This issue is the next step after already integrated packages >>> reorganization and the goal is to have compact package base a the >>> small headless PharoKernel image. >>> >>> Most changes are simple naming unification and some classes I skipped >>> because they need deeper refactorings. >>> >>> I will now check the list once more. >>> >>> -- Pavel >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Pharo-project mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-project mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >> > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
