Hi César: Not, I'm talking about a particular context. I needed a simple logging of text on a text file and don't wanted to invest the time to understand the whole thing behind the logger of K.
I found more easy write my own class (only a few minutes) and I have the thing I need. In my 25 years developing software (starting on old mainframes) I frequentlly found myself writing my own tools, instead of use other complex ones. I'm not talking about this case of logger in particular, but I'm sure you and all of us, invested lot of time searching a tool that make "aproximately" what we need now, but, almost allways the tool don't do "exactly" what we need. At this point, the loss of time begins (in my pov). I tend to use and develop the more simple things I can to solve the specific need, this is my style of work and I think that is the way to have a best use of the time. Germán. 2010/7/15 <[email protected]>: > Germán, > > The e-mail you mention is about three pages of plain text and seems to be > issued in lieu of documentation for the piece of software. > > Are you suggesting anything such size is not worth writing for documenting > the use of SW released for Pharo!? > > > > Em 14/07/2010 08:37, Germán Arduino < [email protected] > escreveu: > Hi Mariano: > > Yes, I know both but honestly wanted something very simple.....May be > I'm too lazy but can't afford to read a mail of this extension: > http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/2008-December/132923.html > :) > > Toothpick look better (to my needs) but still wanted something more simple. > > Germán. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
