Where is the code that we should check to be included in 1.2? Stef
On Jul 19, 2010, at 6:18 PM, Levente Uzonyi wrote: > On Mon, 19 Jul 2010, Henrik Johansen wrote: > > ... > The wkd in Pharo 1.1 didn't really result in a speedup :) > Better Identity hashing, encoding conversions, the other collection changes > which made it in, plus rendering speedups f.ex through inlining alot of > common morph extensions, and using Strike fonts by default, were though! > > > That's a nice euphemism. I didn't check the code thoroughly, but rehashing > seems to be O(n^2) in WeakKeyDictionary. This affects it's subclasses and > WeakRegistry which affects the whole finalization process. > > (Recently I did a benchmark of Seaside 3.0, where Squeak handled 1.28x more > requests/second than Pharo under "heavy load" (50 concurrent users flooding > the server) with the Kom adaptor.) > > > Levente > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
