Serge Stinckwich-2 wrote: > > Yes sure there is a lot of trash in the SqueakSource repository. Maybe we > could organize the repository in the front page the way github > (http://github.com/explore ) are doing. What is important to see are > the most active projects ;-) > > A lot of functionalities could be copied from github i guess. What could > be nice also is to be able to see a MC repository as a git repository. I > dunno if it's feasible, but it could give a lot of exposure in the > open-source community to Squeak/Pharo/Smalltalk projects than today. >
I would also stick with one common term as apposed to "project" vs "repository" and out of those 2 "repository" probably makes the most sense. There is probably not much added value of having "groups" or "teams" either. -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/SqueakSource-down-tp2296645p2298264.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
