2010/7/22 Gary Chambers <[email protected]> > Do we have anyone responsibly for these kind of "near core" packages? > > The idea behind ConfigurationOfPharoNonCore is that WE (pharo developers) are the maintainers, and not "external maintainers". So, this is the difference between this PharoNonCore and PharoDev. In PharoDev we have a lot of development tools, and mostly, maintained by external people. PharoNonCore should be part as Pharo, but that shouldn't be part of the core. However, it is maitained by the Pharo developers.
Cheers Mariano > Regards, Gary > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* Mariano Martinez Peck <[email protected]> > *To:* [email protected] > *Sent:* Thursday, July 22, 2010 3:40 PM > *Subject:* Re: [Pharo-project] State of Sound in Morph > > > > On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 3:45 PM, Adrian Lienhard <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> On Jul 22, 2010, at 14:42 , Stéphane Ducasse wrote: >> >> > probably because we were stupid to remove it from the image. >> >> I don't think so. >> >> Rather because we have: >> - nobody who takes responsibility to maintain this package >> - no tests for this package >> - no build and test server to detect problems automatically >> >> > I think it is a combination of the 2. First, we are not stupid to remove it > from core. They HAVE to be removed and put it as separate package. > > Then, I agree with ALL adrian comments. But I also agree that this problem > can be minimized. When you remove methods/classes in PharoCore, it would be > good to search them in "Pharo". That's why I did > ConfigurationOfPharoNonCore. > > Cheers > > Mariano > > >> Cheers, >> Adrian >> >> BTW, the two expressions posted below work for me on a recent Mac VM in a >> Pharo 1.0 image. >> >> >> > If you can check there are two fixes on the bug archives and it would be >> great that somebody compares with squeak >> > version. I did not see that much changes from this part of the system on >> their side. >> > >> > Stef >> > On Jul 22, 2010, at 2:36 PM, Hilaire Fernandes wrote: >> > >> >> I tried the Pharo sound package, so far it looks sound is not working. >> >> Is it true or is it a mistake of myself. >> >> >> >> For example: >> >> >> >> No sound output when executing: >> >> FMSound bass1 play >> >> >> >> DNU FMSound copy when executing: >> >> (FMSound lowMajorScaleOn: FMSound bass1) play >> >> >> >> Hilaire >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> Pharo-project mailing list >> >> [email protected] >> >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Pharo-project mailing list >> > [email protected] >> > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-project mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >> > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
