I agree that it should be removed, but this means that many tools need to be rewritten in plain morphic.
Lukas 2010/8/2 Richard Durr <[email protected]>: > +1. > See Gilad's text about least common denominator in UI-widgetery > > On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 12:20 PM, stephane ducasse > <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi guys >> >> during the sprint I discussed with Gary about ToolBuilder and we think >> that it would be better to remove it >> since a lot of new widgets are not covered so this means that we will be >> constantly limiting ourselves. >> Of course ToolBuilder is a nice idea (if we would have several UI >> framework). So far we got only one >> and we would have several we would have to take the smallest common >> denominator. >> Another idea would be to extend toolBuilder to support new widgets. >> So what do you think? >> >> Stef >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-project mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > -- Lukas Renggli www.lukas-renggli.ch _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
