Hi Alex,

Now that I've managed to use Pharo at work (youhou !!) I'm in a case where I
have very long tests (selenium acceptance tests) *and* I want them to run.
Ideally I also want to queue and schedule them (if a test is saved twice in
a queue, run only once and put it in higher position on the queue).

Solutions:
- have to running modes for Autotest (normal and batch)
- tagging
- ?

Laurent


On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 8:01 AM, Alexandre Bergel <[email protected]>wrote:

> Ideally, we should not tag long tests. The system should be smart enough to
> characterize a test as long. If it takes more than 200ms, then it is long.
> Autotest should then offer me to include long test or not in the automatic
> test execution.
>
> Using tags means that I have to go over each method test and tag them. This
> is a costly effort that is likely to not work in practice.
>
> We have
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
> TestCase class>>newTestDictionary
>        ^ Dictionary new at: #timeStamp put: TimeStamp now;
>                at: #passed put: Set new;
>                at: #failures put: Set new;
>                at: #errors put: Set new;
>                yourself
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
>
> Maybe it should be extended with
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
>                at: #long put: Set new
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
>
> I guess the tweak in SUnit to identify long tests should not be that hard
> to implement.
>
> Cheers,
> Alexandre
>
>
> On 26 Jul 2010, at 07:44, laurent laffont wrote:
>
> >
> > On Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 10:16 AM, Alexandre Bergel <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > I have been using Autotest for a while already. I greatly reduce the
> window switching. This is cool.
> > However, I have to disable Autotest when the tests take time to execute.
> >
> >
> > An idea is to be able to tag tests with pragmas to put them in
> categories. So we can have a LongRunning category which is not run by
> default. Like NUnit (http://www.nunit.org/index.php?p=category&r=2.2).
> >
> > Then SUnit could be enhanced to show these categories. Useful to quickly
> select all tests related to a project for example; or run only performance
> tests.
> >
> >
> > How would you name the tag ? Where the implementation should go ?
> (TestCase ?)
> >
> >
> > Laurent.
> >
> >
> > Alexandre
> >
> >
> > On 15 Jun 2010, at 21:41, laurent laffont wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Alexandre,
> > >
> > > I've reorganized Autotest to write tests. The tests now run in a thread
> with lower priority. Thanks for feedback.
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > >
> > > Laurent Laffont
> > >
> > > http://pharocasts.blogspot.com/
> > > http://magaloma.blogspot.com/
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 4:52 PM, Alexandre Bergel <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > > Hi Laurent,
> > >
> > > I tried to program while having AutoTest running.
> > > More importantly than the interface, I experienced some problem with
> long executing tests. Basically, these tests should not be executed while I
> am programming. Or at least in a thread of a lesser priority. Am I the only
> one to experience this?
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Alexandre
> > >
> > >
> > > On 11 Jun 2010, at 09:02, laurent laffont wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 2:29 PM, Alexandre Bergel <
> [email protected]> wrote:
> > > > Hi Laurent,
> > > >
> > > > I like Autotest. It is true that I always execute the test after
> modifying it.
> > > > There are three horizontal panes. Why so? Is it just to open a
> debugger when necessary?
> > > >
> > > > I want to be able to open a debugger from autotest. I agree the GUI
> is crap now.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > We could imagine one standalone button instead with a green color to
> say the test I just edited is green, and yellow or red when it fails. In
> that case, clicking on the button open a debugger.
> > > >
> > > > I just feel the window of autotest takes a lot of space in the
> screen, without having a real benefit.
> > > >
> > > > Yes it's true. I'm still thinking on a good GUI. But I'm learning how
> to make GUI now :)
> > > >
> > > > If you look at Autotest package, AutotestView is just the GUI, so we
> can implement several GUI and see the best solution. I need to take the time
> to do it, repository is read / write so feel free to commit :)
> > > >
> > > > What I want to have is a dashboard docked on one side of the screen
> which acts like  you're driving a car. It's always visible, you have to be
> able to look quickly at it as when you check the speed of your car, adjust
> your drive, ....
> > > >
> > > > Also another problem with the current version if that if a test
> fails, change it and fails again, you don't see it has run (nothing moves in
> the GUI).
> > > >
> > > > Finally, another problem is that you see that a test has failed, but
> you don't know why (SUnit TestRunner has the same problem). I want to
> display the exception message too.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks a lot for feedback.
> > > >
> > > > Laurent Laffont
> > > >
> > > > http://pharocasts.blogspot.com/
> > > > http://magaloma.blogspot.com/
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Cheers,
> > > > Alexandre
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 3 Jun 2010, at 17:11, laurent laffont wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > I've written a proof-of-concept for Autotest. Draft/crappy code and
> no tests (exploration mode :) but it loads on PharoCore-1.1-11383-beta
> image.
> > > > >
> > > > > Load it:
> > > > > Gofer new
> > > > >       squeaksource: 'Autotest';
> > > > >       package: 'Autotest';
> > > > >       load
> > > > >
> > > > > Open it:
> > > > > AutotestView open
> > > > > (there's  en entry in WorldMenu > Tools)
> > > > >
> > > > > And change a tested method to see the results.
> > > > >
> > > > > There's a bug I need to find, maybe someone knows:
> > > > > - Change Bag>>occurrencesOf:
> > > > > - Autotest gives:
> > > > >
> > > > > 284 run, 281 passes, 0 expected failures, 1 failures, 2 errors, 0
> unexpected passes
> > > > > Failures:
> > > > > CollectionRootTest>>#test0FixtureIterateTest
> > > > >
> > > > > Errors:
> > > > > CollectionRootTest>>#testBasicCollect
> > > > > CollectionRootTest>>#testDoWithout
> > > > >
> > > > > but in SUnit CollectionRootTest gives
> > > > > 0 run, 0 passes, 0 expected failures, 0 failures, 0 errors, 0
> unexpected passes ??
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Cheers,
> > > > >
> > > > > Laurent Laffont
> > > > >
> > > > > http://pharocasts.blogspot.com/
> > > > > http://magaloma.blogspot.com/
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 6:09 PM, Alexandre Bergel <
> [email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > The idea is excellent.
> > > > >
> > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > Alexandre
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On 3 Jun 2010, at 10:22, laurent laffont wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 3:42 PM, Alexandre Bergel <
> [email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > > > You may have a lot of noise.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I guess that Ruby uses files as a unit of
> development/deployment. The closest Smalltalk/Pharo has is the class and the
> package.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I would suggest that TestCase which would use this feature use
> some pragma/method to identify/declare which classes/packages this test
> depends upon. Then the "autotest" framework would register such tests and
> listen for changes in the given classes/packages, launching required tests
> whenever a change happen.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Additionally, one could declare such a pragma on a single test
> method, when this test should be run for a specific class.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Of course, you also to take care of long running tests, which
> you probably want to exclude from auto-testing.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I see autotest in Pharo in a slighly different way: When I press
> save in the Monticello browser, I have a popup menu which asks me whether
> (i) I want to run all the tests or (ii) only the tests that cover that I
> changed from the last version.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Does this make sense?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Please no popup :) What I like in ruby autotest is that I can
> quickly look at test results if I want (or not) without stop writing. Often
> you want to see your tests failing, as you type / save code. I don't have to
> stop writing, click a button, wait test results, go again.... testing is
> done in background and I just see notifications whether it's OK or not.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > So test log in a Transcript is OK for me.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > For autotest unit of work is file: it runs the test file which
> has the same name as the code file, but you can customize this behavior. For
> autotest-rails:
> > > > > > "A simplified version of Autotest heuristics in this mode would
> be:
> > > > > > When changing a test file, only this file is run (e.g.
> test/unit/foo_test.rb →test/unit/foo_test.rb).
> > > > > > When changing a model file, only associated unit test file is run
> (e.g.app/models/foo.rb → test/unit/foo_test.rb).
> > > > > > When changing a controller file, associated functional test file
> is run (e.g.app/controllers/foo_controller.rb
> →test/functional/foo_controller_test.rb).
> > > > > > When changing a fixture file, associated unit test and functional
> test are run (e.g.app/fixtures/foos.yml → test/unit/foo_test.rb
> +test/functional/foo_controller_test.rb).
> > > > > > When changing a helper file, associated functional test file is
> run (e.g.app/helpers/foo_helper.rb →test/functional/foo_controller_test.rb).
> > > > > > When changing application_helper.rb file all functional test
> files are run (e.g.application_helper.rb → test/functional/*_test.rb).
> > > > > > When changing a file under the config directory, all tests are
> run."
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Laurent
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > > Alexandre
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
> > > > > > Alexandre Bergel  http://www.bergel.eu
> > > > > > ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > Pharo-project mailing list
> > > > > > [email protected]
> > > > > >
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
> > > > > >
> > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > Pharo-project mailing list
> > > > > > [email protected]
> > > > > >
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
> > > > > Alexandre Bergel  http://www.bergel.eu
> > > > > ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > Pharo-project mailing list
> > > > > [email protected]
> > > > >
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
> > > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > Pharo-project mailing list
> > > > > [email protected]
> > > > >
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
> > > > Alexandre Bergel  http://www.bergel.eu
> > > > ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Pharo-project mailing list
> > > > [email protected]
> > > > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Pharo-project mailing list
> > > > [email protected]
> > > > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
> > >
> > > --
> > > _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
> > > Alexandre Bergel  http://www.bergel.eu
> > > ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Pharo-project mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Pharo-project mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
> > Alexandre Bergel  http://www.bergel.eu
> > ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Pharo-project mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Pharo-project mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>
> --
> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
> Alexandre Bergel  http://www.bergel.eu
> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>
_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Reply via email to