On 04.08.2010 19:15, Andreas Raab wrote: > On 8/4/2010 9:57 AM, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote: >> Hi Adrei, excellent :) >> >> BTW, for HTTP Client you should cc Andreas Raab or squeak mailing >> list.... > > Squeak-dev please > (http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/squeak-dev). > >> On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 6:08 PM, Andrei Stebakov <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> I also found that cookies were not correctly sent. >> Every cookie was sent with its own "Cookie: " header which is not >> correct. > > I'm curious, why do you think that's incorrect? My understanding is that > RFC 2616 explicitly allows that: > > "Multiple message-header fields with the same field-name MAY be > present in a message if and only if the entire field-value for that > header field is defined as a comma-separated list [i.e., #(values)]. It > MUST be possible to combine the multiple header fields into one > 'field-name: field-value' pair, without changing the semantics of the > message, by appending each subsequent field-value to the first, each > separated by a comma."
You're correct, but that doesn't mean the implementations follow the spec :-(. I can only speak for Set-Cookie, there you have to send each cookie on a new line because the expires date format includes a comma and Firefox and IE can't handle that. Cheers Philippe _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
