thanks for reporting can you open a pharo bug entry else there is 80% of chance we will forget.
Stef On Aug 9, 2010, at 10:40 PM, jaayer wrote: > In squeak, if you send ifEmpty: or ifNotEmpty: to a collection and the > condition being tested (emptiness or non-emptiness) is false, then the > receiver (the collection) is returned rather than nil. This is more useful > and more in line with how ifNil: and ifNotNil: work (which each otherwise > return the receiver). > > See this bug report for more information: > > http://bugs.squeak.org/view.php?id=6364 > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
