>>
>
> The infinitive in English is two words with possibly other words separating
> them, the word "to" and then the verb lacking any "s" or "es" or other tense,
> number or person modifiers: "to program" or "to code."
Thanks. I know the difference :) I meant in method selectors include: vs
includes:
> I choose preservesCDataSections because it is more obvious that it returns a
> boolean and that the corresponding preservesCDataSections: accepts a boolean.
> If you call the testing message preserveCDataSections,
No I would write is
isPreservingCDataSections
doesPreserveCDataSections
for me
preservesCDataSection:
should better be written as
preserveCDataSections:
Because I do not have to think if I should put an S or not.
> it sounds more like you are commanding the receiver to do so rather than
> asking if it already does..
>
> Also, my mail client ate the example code, so here it is again:
> doc :=
> (XMLDOMParser on: '<root><![CDATA[&foo;&bar;]]></root>')
> preservesCDataSections: true;
Yes but it looks like an order too and I do not understand the difference
between
using
preserveSCD....
and
parseDocument (with no S after parseDocument)
> parseDocument.
> doc root firstNode
> produces:
> <![CDATA[&foo;&bar;]]>
I follow Beck and Smalltalk with Style (see my web page) convention.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project