On Aug 12, 2010, at 8:37 PM, Göran Krampe wrote: > On 08/11/2010 10:26 AM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote: >> rst? >> >> RemoteSmalltalk? > > Yes, and there are multiple other packages too. > > A few other things that might be interesting in "inter image communication": > > - D-Bus. Bert and the guys made a rather ambitious plugin for libdbus and > stuff above it. This is not interesting for Squeak2Squeak, but definitely > interesting for cross language stuff. > > - Message Queues. There are tons of these today, like RabbitMQ, ActiveMQ etc > etc. And there is an AMQP protocol implementation on SS, and yesterday I > released a first shot at a STOMP implementation too! These message queues > implement publish/subscribe models etc so they are different beasts, but IMHO > possible more interesting than "straight RPC". > > - If you go for a transport level that is "non Smalltalk", like say a message > queue above, then Tirade (also on SS) could work as a fast way to "serialize > messages" through such a transport. When I get STOMP finished I will make a > simple demo of that.
I really want that > Also, writing a forking Socket server is really simple in Squeak. The > Blackfoot package on SS can act as a really simple and documented example of > such a server. It would be a nice example for the chapter on Socket noury and luc are writing for the new book. > > Also, if you want to play around with character/byte-streams between Squeak > Processes (in one image) then the SharedStreams package is neat - in fact, I > think it should be included in the "standard library", and probably also > replace SharedQueue. open a ticket :) > > regards, Göran > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
