On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 9:07 AM, Fernando olivero <[email protected]>wrote:
> humm...I agree with Kent Beck and Stef, because conceptually a String > shouldnt know how to answer #seconds. > > Maybe its a matter of having better interactions, smarter text morphs , > than introducing this in the "model". > > maybe where are discussing what we prefer...if nice in words/language or better in OOP. For example, I may (not sure) agree Number understands #seconds. But I may think also that a better OOP would not Number understand #seconds but stead have Duration seconds: 3 But...'3 seconds' is nicer...it is more similar to our language. > Fernando > > > On Aug 23, 2010, at 9:00 AM, Brent Pinkney wrote: > > >> I would really like to have the approach proposed by K. Beck on > conversion > >> methods. Conversion methods for API compatible objects. Of course it > will > >> lead to less compact program (URL readFrom: 'http://' instead of > 'http://' > >> url) but avoids a lot of code in String (of course class extensions > limit > >> the plague). > > > > Hi, please reconsider this. There is just no way (Duration seconds: 3) is > > better than '3 seconds'. > > > > This smacks of working for the computer instead of the other way around. > > > > Brent > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Pharo-project mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
