Yes. On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 11:38:09PM -0400, Schwab,Wilhelm K wrote: > Are the VM changes you mention the ones that exist now in the Linux VM? > > > ________________________________________ > From: [email protected] > [[email protected]] On Behalf Of Serge Stinckwich > [[email protected]] > Sent: Monday, August 30, 2010 8:16 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] SerialPort - named ports on Linux > > To be tested : http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=1057 > > On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 3:24 AM, Schwab,Wilhelm K <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hello all, > > > > I recalled seeing mention of the Linux vm's now supporting named ports, and > > I found the code for that, at least in the vm. My understanding gets fuzzy > > as we enter the plugin and primitives. At a minimum, there are a few > > ByName methods to be added, and Squeak 4.1 contains open and close methods > > that test on type (int vs. string) to open or close by name or not as > > appropriate. > > > > Is this as simple as gathering the changes and adding them to Pharo, or > > does it require VMMaker magic? > > > > Bill > >
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
