El lun, 13-09-2010 a las 14:02 +0200, Lukas Renggli escribió: > How you derive the type?
I think it only uses the name of the inst var to name the parameter var in the accessor. > > >From the method name? I think only very few accessors/inst-vars are > named after the type. > > Also note that you can edit the type directly in the changes browser > before you install it, that's what I typically do. > > Lukas > > 2010/9/13 Mariano Martinez Peck <[email protected]>: > > i would like that too > > > > On Sep 12, 2010 7:27 PM, "Bart Gauquie" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Dear list, > > > > I've noticed that when I'm using the generate accessors refactoring, I'm > > always adapting the generated code for the mutator: > > number: anObject > > number := anObject > > to: > > number: aNumber > > number := aNumber > > So I've adapted the refactoring code a bit so that it automatically > > generates this correctly. Anybody also thinks this is useful? If so, I will > > create a bug/improvement and a slice for it. > > Kind regards, > > > > Bart > > _______________________________________________ > > Pharo-project mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Pharo-project mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > > > > -- Miguel Cobá http://miguel.leugim.com.mx _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
