On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 7:09 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck < [email protected]> wrote:
> > > On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 6:58 PM, Romain Robbes <[email protected]>wrote: > >> This one of the tests that were inherited from ECompletion I believe ... >> I don't really know what to do with them. >> >> Same for your other email actually, although I seem to remember it >> used to take a normal amount of time, maybe the implementation of some >> method changed for the worse? >> > > I remember there was some slowdown in certain type of collections in Pharo > 1.1. I don't know if hashed, or sorted, weak...I don't know. > Maybe it is something related to that? > Ups...sorry this answer was to the other email..the one of the time... for this one, I have no idea. MAybe just chaning it to 80 is ok :) Or maybe Lukas can explain us. Cheers Mariano > > Thanks > > Mariano > > > >> >> Romain >> >> On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 6:32 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> > This fails where it does: >> > >> > self assert: count == model entries size. >> > self assert: count > 100. >> > >> > >> > since model entries size -> 85 >> > >> > >> > Of course, if I change the test to >> > >> > self assert: count == model entries size. >> > self assert: count > 80. >> > >> > it works :) >> > >> > Romain ? >> > >> > thanks >> > >> > mariano >> > >> > >
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
