On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 6:23 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck <[email protected] > wrote:
> Hi. So....if I want to intercept ALL message sends....going to #normalSend > is not enough since I have #class, #==, Float>>#+ etc that are executed > directly like bytecodes. So...my questions are now: > > 1) Those special selectors are those that are in "Smalltalk > specialSelectors" ? are there more? all from there are special? > > 2) All those "Smalltalk specialSelectors" have their associated bytecode > primitive in Interpreter?? If true, then I should modify all bytecodePrim* > in Interpreter. I am right? If I do that, that's all ? I am intercepting > everything? > > Sorry I need not to count those bytecodePrim* that do a "normalSend" at the end. Isn't it? > Thanks a lot in advance, > > Mariano > > > > On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 11:09 PM, Craig Latta <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> >> > Craig Latta has done all this work, talk to him. >> >> Sure, I'd be happy to discuss it. >> >> >> -C >> >> -- >> Craig Latta >> www.netjam.org >> + 31 020 894 6247 >> + 1 415 287 3547 >> >> >> >> >
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
