On 11 October 2010 21:07, Schwab,Wilhelm K <bsch...@anest.ufl.edu> wrote: > Sig, > > As a friend here: when did I say I'd remove all? Remove and process one at a > time. I will admit to having a bias toward doing this with a single executor > per object, but even if multiples turn out to have value (need to hunt down > and read Levente's description of that), the same idea should apply. >
Removing and processing one at a time could do the job, but it will be very inefficient (especially on VMs which not support new finalization). Because: - you have to enter critical section for scanning valueDictionary - you then have to leave critical section for sending a single #finalize - then you should start over and look for next element with nil key (if any) So, as i said, devil in details. > Bill > -- Best regards, Igor Stasenko AKA sig. _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
