That is wonderful news! Didier, There is a natural question that arises: what are the performance implications of Smalltalk or Java? Why not C with a Smalltalk wrapper? I have not tried number crunching with Cog or NativeBoost doing some of the expensive lifting, but absent those advantages, the benefit from coding tight loops in C has been nothing short of eerie. I have never tried Java for it. If there is a speed boost to be had, would a port offend you? I am a pragmatist, so it would begin one function at a time, chosen by the type of work I do and driven by when the machine grunts.
Thanks, Bill ________________________________________ From: [email protected] [[email protected]] On Behalf Of Stéphane Ducasse [[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2010 4:02 PM To: Pharo Development; The general-purpose Squeak developers list; ESUG Mailing list Cc: Didier H. Besset Subject: [Pharo-project] Object Oriented Implementation of Numerical Methods" under the MIT license I want to thanks didier for releasing the code of his book under MIT. Thanks! Begin forwarded message: > From: Didier Besset <[email protected]> > Date: October 14, 2010 8:06:52 PM GMT+02:00 > To: Stéphane Ducasse <[email protected]> > Subject: Disclaimer > > I hereby release the code of my book "Object Oriented Implementation of > Numerical Methods" under the MIT license. > > Didier Besset _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
