On 17.10.2010 20:49, Igor Stasenko wrote:
On 17 October 2010 21:45, Henrik Sperre Johansen
<[email protected]> wrote:
Levente Uzonyi-2 wrote:
Btw why doesn't the windows VM signal the semaphore?
Levente
http://forum.world.st/InputSemaphore-on-Windows-td1934394.html#a2014576
Basically, there may or may not be some issue with them not being noticed in
the image, it hasn't been a priority since the Squeak image doesn't depend
on it, and no-one have set aside the time to fix it.
Not very hard really, just time-consuming and tedious checking you've hit
all the points it has to be signalled.
I don't think that this is the problem with image being sluggy.
It would feel sluggy from very beginning, not after you load a lots of
stuff into image, isnt?
Yup, this was mainly to answer why Pharo doesn't use the InputSemaphore,
a short detour which hopefully ends here.
I don't have an image which has been running for 7 hours (non-core at
least), and haven't experienced the slowdown reported myself, so didn't
feel qualified to comment on that matter.
Cheers,
Henry
_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
