Johan Fabry wrote: > > I like the idea to be able to use more traditional/well-known SCM, however > we may be opening another can of worms here: CVS versus SVN versus GIT. In > the end, if I would choose the above route, I would go with a tool I am > familiar with, in my case SVN. I think the same would hold for other > people, so in the end we may end up needing to support multiple tools. > That's obviously not such a good idea ... >
In line with the distributed nature of Smalltalk community and Monticello it is probably a good idea to stick to distributed version control systems like GIT, Mercurial, Bazaar, Darcs and pick one to as a sandpit. -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Thoughts-on-Monticello-GIT-tp3019086p3019174.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
