Re: [Pharo-project] a question about reef naming conventions

[Peter van Rooijen]

On Thu, 04 Nov 2010 00:01:24 +0100, Diogenes Moreira <diogenes.more...@gmail.com> wrote: I think the third option is clearer than the others. I agree, but I'd use a "real" prefix, exactly the same characters at the beginning, every time. So that would become: reefAsView, reefAsCallback. In my own code, I prefix selectors sometimes and always as real prefixes. But I would use an abbreviation for the project/"namespace" prefix instead of something that could be a word, so that the prefix stands out more. So that might become: rfAsView, rfAsCallback. Cheers, Peter Best Regards On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 7:52 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <esteba...@gmail.com> wrote: Hi, I'm having some doubts about how to call some methods for Reef. To be precise, I'm not sure about the naming og the method extensions I'm adding. For instance, I have an extension for Object, the method #asView, and some others in BlockClosure, #asCallback, asCallbackOn:, etc. So... I want to ask which naming convention is better. 1) Just let the methods like now? 2) adding a prefix, like reView, reCallback, etc.? 3) adding a full name prefix, asReefView, asReefCallback, etc.? What do you think? Cheers, Esteban -- Peter van Rooijen Nijlring 83 5152 VJ Drunen m: 06-2854 2048