On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 5:39 PM, Luc Fabresse <[email protected]>wrote:
> Hi Dennis, > > Yes, TDD is highly popular and encouraged in the Smalltalk community. > And mocks are not necessary in most cases. > Hi Luc, why Mocks are less necessary in Smalltalk than in other (Ruby/Python/whatever...) languages ? Do you have some examples / link ? Sometimes I think a mocking library should be in PharoCore so I don't need to write my own mocks..... Cheers, Laurent > > #Luc > > > 2010/11/23 Dennis Schetinin <[email protected]> > > How is it compared to Mocketry (http://www.squeaksource.com/Mocketry.html)? >> SMock? >> >> BTW, isn't TDD without mocks a bit incomplete? And is TDD popular among >> smalltalkers actually? >> >> 2010/11/22 Mariano Martinez Peck <[email protected]> >> >> This is cool Anindya. I don't need mocks right now, but I will keep it in >>> mind! >>> >>> I cc'ed Pharo-dev mailing list. >>> >>> Cheers >>> >>> Mariano >>> >>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>> From: Anindya Haldar <[email protected]> >>> Date: Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 10:11 AM >>> Subject: [Pharo-users] TestMock: a full featured mock testing framework >>> now available in SqueakSource >>> To: [email protected] >>> >>> >>> Dear Pharoers, >>> >>> TestMcok is a full featured mock based test framework that I am very glad >>> to contribute to the community. It is in squeaksource under the project name >>> TestMock. Please feel free to try it, and feedback will be greatly >>> appreciated. The wiki section includes a brief how-to guide with code >>> examples. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Anindya Haldar >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Pharo-users mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-users >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Dennis Schetinin >> > >
