On Dec 5, 2010, at 4:06 PM, Adrian Lienhard wrote: > One item on the list that is missing, in my opinion, is a "Package management > system". With Metacello we have the underlying infrastructure but what we > lack is a process, the supporting tools, and building of a community around > contributing and managing external packages. Today it's hard to find whether > somebody already did what one needs, and its hard to install others work > because dependencies and general information about a package is missing.
Yes now I'm waiting to see Metacello 1.0 out so that we can fill the corresponding repositories with adequate configuration. I think that it will be already a good step and will have a structuring impact > > Adrian > > BTW, for an example of a simple catalogue see http://pypi.python.org/pypi and > this page for a package description: http://pypi.python.org/pypi/mcs/0.3.3 > > > On Dec 4, 2010, at 16:06 , Stéphane Ducasse wrote: > >> Hi guys >> >> Here is a list of important projects for the future and you can help us >> making the infrastructure of Pharo really better. >> The idea is also to give you a better view of the work we want to structure. >> We can use this list to discuss during the IRC meeting. >> let me know what you think >> >> http://code.google.com/p/pharo/wiki/Projects >> >> Stef > >
