Noury Bouraqadi-2 wrote: > > -You want to test something related to classes, and in this case you can > use the SUnit extension I introduced a while ago ClassFactoryForTestCase. > It's part of the core image. >
Cool, that's it exactly. Now I have two new questions: * What if ClassFactoryForTestCase used the separate-SystemDictionary approach? Wouldn't you only need to clean up the logs and the classes would get gc-ed (even if cleanup was never called)? * Is my OP correct that it is safe to do what I was doing i.e. no effect to the system (except maybe the doit in the changes)? (I may have another application for it) Thanks. Sean -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Creating-temporary-classes-for-testing-tp3080408p3080630.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
