Torsten, I can just shove it out there, but I would feel better if someone else would try it and report on success/failure or good/bad opinions of it. Beyond that, the question is whether anyone cares about enumerating tables and fields? If there is interest, it is worth talking about what might be better kept on my side. Some of the questionable methods are "redundant spellings" that are of interest to me because I have a lot of senders. What do you think?
Bill ________________________________________ From: [email protected] [[email protected]] On Behalf Of Torsten Bergmann [[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, December 09, 2010 1:54 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [Pharo-project] ODBC, loadFFI and friends! >Please have a look at > > > http://www.squeaksource.com/PharoInbox/DolphinCompatibility-ODBC-BillSchwab.3.mcz > >It adds a few methods that I missed (one could argue that I should package >>some of this separately) and gives access to table and field names. Hi Bill, I once contacted Frank Urbach (creator of the package on squeaksource), but got no response. However: http://www.squeaksource.com/ODBC is "Read And Write" so you can integrate your changes easily. It's MIT and open anyway so anything that makes life easier should be added. Thanks Torsten -- GMX DSL Doppel-Flat ab 19,99 €/mtl.! Jetzt auch mit gratis Notebook-Flat! http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/dsl
