Yes, but unfortunately that's not easy to do with Glamour, AFAIK. Lukas
On 15 December 2010 18:00, Alexandre Bergel <[email protected]> wrote: > A cheap solution is to adjust the indexes according to the number of > backslash key and non-backslash key that one press. > > Alexandre > > > On 15 Dec 2010, at 13:35, Fabrizio Perin wrote: > >> Hi Alex, >> well the text index is calculated when you run the rules so of course if you >> touch the text than the indexes are not precise anymore. When you accept the >> text is saved and the rules are recalculated so also the positions of the >> errors are calculated again. >> >> Unfortunately i don't have a nice solution for this problem. One way could >> be: >> - when you save instead running the rules you just save the modified >> document. >> - than all the indexes of all the errors are update with the difference in >> size between the old and the new document. >> >> I don't know if this is going to be faster than simply re-run the rules. >> Anyway I will give it a try and i will let you know. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Fabrizio >> >> >> 2010/12/15 Alexandre Bergel <[email protected]> >> hi! >> >> I am now using TextLint over my submissions. Each time I modify the text, >> the rest of the errors have a wrong text index. It makes it difficult to use. >> I do an accept, to save my .tex and run the rules again, but it takes time... >> >> Cheers, >> Alexandre >> -- >> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: >> Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu >> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > -- > _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: > Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu > ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. > > > > > > > -- Lukas Renggli www.lukas-renggli.ch
