On Dec 16, 2010, at 7:06 PM, Schwab,Wilhelm K wrote: > Is the server building 1.1 or 1.1.1?
1.1.1 But I don't want to have that in the name of the Build Target, as this then would need to be renamed for 1.1.2 (and doing such point releases now has virtualy an overhead of 0, I should add). This will be better as soon as we add the version and update number as Adrian suggested. > > > ________________________________________ > From: [email protected] > [[email protected]] On Behalf Of Marcus Denker > [[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, December 16, 2010 12:55 PM > To: [email protected] > Cc: Moose-dev Moose Dev > Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] [Hudson] 1.2 build > > On Dec 16, 2010, at 5:26 PM, Tudor Girba wrote: > >> Great news! >> >> I already updated the Moose build to be based on the current 1.2: >> http://hudson.moosetechnology.org/job/moose-latest-dev-on-pharo-1.2/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/moose-on-pharo12/ >> >> >> Maybe one suggestion: it would be good to name the image as pharo-1.2-dev, >> rather than just dev1.2. > > Ok, I will do that. In addition, it would be nice if the zip would contain > inside some version number or date or something. > > Marcus > > > > -- > Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de > INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD. > > > -- Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD.
