Alright, thank you! I will just sort in my accessor, that seems to be working pretty well. Thank you for your responses!
David Zmick /dz0004455\ On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 11:20 AM, Eliot Miranda <[email protected]>wrote: > > > On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 10:31 PM, Ramon Leon <[email protected]>wrote: > >> On 12/21/2010 08:51 PM, David Zmick wrote: >> >>> What can I do to fix this? >>> >> >> Another option might be to use a sort block that isn't a block, but an >> ordinary object that responds as a sort block would, allowing the collection >> to be serialized successfully. > > > Another option would be to fix the limitation. There's nothing > conceptually preventing serializing a block. It's just an object after all. > You have some choices > - how do you serialize the home context (you need to serialize every > context along the static chain out to the home context)? It should be > serialized with a nil sender. > > - bringing the block back in do you try and hook up the method to the > corresponding method in image or leave it anonymous; leave it anonymous. > > 2ยข > Eliot > > >> >> -- >> Ramon Leon >> http://onsmalltalk.com >> >> >
