OK. I'm working on it now.

Should I update beta2 or create beta3 ?

I'm also adding Shortcuts-Help.

Laurent

On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 2:20 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Ahh Laurent, don't forget to add those projects also to the group: 'Dev
> Tools'   in ConfigurationOfPharo
>
> Cheers
>
> Mariano
>
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 11:28 AM, Mariano Martinez Peck <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 12:45 PM, laurent laffont <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 10:59 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 9:04 AM, laurent laffont <
>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> What do you think about adding these packages as default in Pharo 1.2:
>>>>> - ConfigurationOfMocketry
>>>>> - ConfigurationOfXMLSupport
>>>>> - ConfigurationOfCryptography  (does'nt exist yet, planned to be
>>>>> created in a local coding-dojo on Tuesday).
>>>>>
>>>>> Motivations:
>>>>> - XMLSupport and Cryptography are often needed to consume web services
>>>>> - Mocketry because I want to write tests using Mocks and it's easier to
>>>>> work when tools are in standard Pharo (and then newcomers can see Mocketry
>>>>> examples).
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I will update ConfigurationOfPharo 1.2 (beta3 ?) if people agree.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Hi Laurent. I agree it would be nice to include those 3 projects in
>>>> PharoDev.  Do they have tests? are they all green in pharo 1.2?
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> - ConfigurationOfMocketry has 479 tests, all green now in Pharo 1.2  +
>>> HelpSystem help.
>>> - ConfigurationOfXMLSupport version: '1.0.2' has 32 tests, all green (but
>>> blessing is #development so I don't know if we can include it). version
>>> 1.0.0 has 8 tests, green.
>>> - ConfigurationOfAutotest: 27 tests green + HelpSystem help.
>>>
>>>
>> Hi Laurent. I think both kind of tools are important for doing business in
>> Pharo: test and XML support. Both have been asked several times in the
>> mailing list. Having them in the dev image would be easier for this point of
>> view, and users can help detecting bugs, using it, etc.
>>
>> I would include those 3 projects in the PharoDev. So, go ahead and add it
>> in ConfigurationOfPharo. We can always go back.
>>
>> For Autotest, what I suggest is to have it in the image, but not enable by
>> default. THose who want to use it, just open the settings browser and enable
>> it.
>>
>>
>>> For Cryptography I've started to look at it but there's some work to be
>>> done: there's only one packages with all algorithms + tests + core. So it
>>> should be splitted. You are right about MD5 (splitting should resolve this).
>>> Actually 10 tests out of 102 fail.
>>>
>>>
>> For the Cryptography  I would wait a bit, as you say. Because in pharo
>> core we already have the package System-Hashing ... so I am not sure how to
>> deal with it.
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> Mariano
>>
>>
>>> Laurent
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> If true, and people agree, please feel free to update
>>>> ConfigurationOfPharo
>>>>
>>>> I didn't check ConfigurationOfCryptography  but I remember that MD5 and
>>>> few other classes where already integrated in PharoCore. We should avoid
>>>> collisions. Are those classes still alive in the Cryptography  package?
>>>>
>>>> cheers
>>>>
>>>> mariano
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>
>>>>> Laurent Laffont
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to