On 2 January 2011 10:37, Stéphane Ducasse <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Jan 2, 2011, at 1:33 AM, [email protected] wrote: > >> I would like to add to the tally. Changing Object>>copyFrom: to >> Object>>copyStateFrom: makes for me a lot more sense that changing (in fact >> by the creation of) OrderedCollection>>copyFrom: to >> OrderedCollection>>copyFromIndex: >> >> Except we do agree /in limine/ that OrderedCollection>>copyFrom:to: should >> be changed to >> OrederedCollection>>copyFromIndex:toEndIndex: > > This is the problem I thought about it. so I think that we will have to stay > with copyFrom:
For the future, I think that the functionality of #copyFrom:to: should be provided by #at: using an interval/collection as argument (something that is pretty common in about any modern programming language). For now #copyFrom:to: is part of ANSI and should not be touched. Lukas -- Lukas Renggli www.lukas-renggli.ch
