On Jan 3, 2011, at 7:28 PM, [email protected] wrote:
> Em 03/01/2011 15:01, Stéphane Ducasse < [email protected] > escreveu:
>
>> Hi guys
>> I'm brainstorming on what should be our next important actions. My
>> gut feeling is that I would love
>> - to get more class comments and documentation.
>
> I'm all for it. We need to increase the actual and perceived quality
> of our work.
>
>> - get a list of working packages for development expanding the list
> of packages available from:
> http://book.pharo-project.org/book/PharoTools
>
>> - get metacello repositories up and running and start to get
>> certified packages.
>
> I'm not keeping up with the overwhelming stream of messages in this
> list and probably may be missing the kernel of it, but just in case:
> do we have already a certification process for packages?
no and now that hudson is working I would like to see what we can do
especially with metacello
- loading ok
- % comment of
- % of red tests
>> How can we all make sure that this happens?
>
> All of it, it depends on the time frame ;-) IMHO I think priority zero
> is class comments and documentation and second the certification
> process.
>
> Attempting to answer the "how" part of the question, I surmise we will
> keep the discussion on the comments and documentation in the next IRC
> meeting?
Yes
> I see this as THE most important 'cultural' change we all need to undergo
> because of all collaborations we can envisage, writing documentation (or
> comments) for someone else code is the less efficient way of doing it.
>
> Perhaps some form of 'pair commenting' via Skype/IM or IRC _before_ the code
> is uploaded?
I do not know.
Now I try to systematically write comments. I would like to take some example
like the soup package and
see how it goes.
Stef
>
>
> My 0.019999
>
> --
> Cesar Rabak
>
