Hi:

On 04 Jan 2011, at 23:40, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:

> On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 11:35 PM, Stefan Marr <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Igor:
> 
> On 04 Jan 2011, at 22:40, Igor Stasenko wrote:
> 
> > Okay, how about creating a separate
> > VMBenchmarks repository
> > and putting VMBenchmarks package there?
> 
> Sure, sounds good. There are also the Systems benchmarks at 
> http://www.squeaksource.com/PharoBenchmarks.
> 
> 
> So, at least, I was able to run all benchmarks :)
> 
> However, it still needs cleaning, improvement, testing, blah.  But it is a 
> good start point I think.

Well, I am not to sure about the general value of those benchmarks.
There are many microbenchmarks which do not tell you a lot. All those test* 
things.
And well, their value for testing is also questionable. They only can help you 
to identify where it goes *boom* and crashes the VM, but they do not actually 
assert for anything.

Also not sure what the value of Slopstone and Smopstone (names from the top of 
my head might be slightly different) is nowadays.

The compiler benchmark is a reasonable application benchmark.
Would be good to have a few others in that collection, too.

Best regards
Stefan




-- 
Stefan Marr
Software Languages Lab
Vrije Universiteit Brussel
Pleinlaan 2 / B-1050 Brussels / Belgium
http://soft.vub.ac.be/~smarr
Phone: +32 2 629 2974
Fax:   +32 2 629 3525


Reply via email to