Hi Esteban, Yes, I know... So, how do you do the shrinking? ;)
Do you unload by package? If yes, are the remaining MC packages "clean" and there are no obsolete classes etc. in the resulting image? Cheers, Adrian On Jan 5, 2011, at 13:21 , Esteban Lorenzano wrote: > Ah, I forgot to say the the general idea of my "brute shrinking" was opposite > to Pavel's idea: Pavel's pharo kernel images is about to have a really tiny > image and use that as a foundation to build major images. Mine is: having > already a production image, I want to strip from image all things I'm not > using, so my *final* image (not my starting image) is as small as possible. > > Cheers, > Esteban > > El 05/01/2011, a las 4:58a.m., Adrian Lienhard escribió: > >> >> On Jan 4, 2011, at 22:42 , Mariano Martinez Peck wrote: >> >>> ps: I wonder if any of those scripts should be added to ScriptLoader >> >> Yes, that would be good! Like this we can improve them and other people can >> contribute. >> >> Esteban, could you share your experience with unloading packages? I assume >> you had to also reorganize packages to make them cleanly unloadable? If yes >> these changes should be integrated to improve the modularization. >> >> Cheers, >> Adrian >
