Stef,

True.  But it also got caught, perhaps because it was where it had no business 
being.  The great thing about configurations and Hudson is that the server will 
build multiple artifacts.  I think among them should be some bloated images for 
reasons just like this.  The core and a leaner dev would also be in the mix.

Bill



________________________________________
From: [email protected] 
[[email protected]] On Behalf Of Stéphane Ducasse 
[[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2011 3:27 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] Dirty MC Packages in Pharo-1.1.1-OneClickCogVM

why do you need method wrapper in dev?

Again this goes with my mail about pushing metacello dsitributions versus 
pharo-dev+++

Stef


On Jan 12, 2011, at 10:15 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:

> yes, that was a hack I had to do becuase at that moment Cog didn't support 
> well objects as methods, used by MethodWrappers, and when running its tests, 
> it crashed.
> we wanted to create a quick image so that people could start using cog and 
> help testing it.
>
> this is not the case anymore in Pharo 1,2
>
> so, if someone wants, the real solution is to create a new one click of 1.1.1 
> (without touching by hand method wrappers) and put new CogVMs.
>
> cheers
>
> mariano
>
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 8:10 PM, Sven Van Caekenberghe <[email protected]> wrote:
> Yesterday I downloaded Pharo-1.1.1-OneClickCogVM from
>
>        
> https://gforge.inria.fr/frs/download.php/27524/Pharo-1.1.1-OneClickCogVM.zip
>
> and I noticed it has two dirty MC packages (MethodWrappers and Tests).
>
> This is probably a glitch, but not nice and confusion for beginners.
>
> Sven
>
>
>



Reply via email to