I put ConfigurationOfXMLSupport version 1.0 because blessing was #release. But I agree to change.
Laurent On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 12:15 PM, Marcus Denker <[email protected]>wrote: > > On Jan 19, 2011, at 11:43 AM, Tudor Girba wrote: > > > Indeed, this is a problem for Moose in general. We depend on XMLSupport, > but now we cannot update it in PharoDev. I would also strongly support the > idea of removing XMLSupport from PharoDev. > > > > What would be important: we need the latest version in Pharo 1.2... else > how can we ever have a version where the tests are green? > (not of XML, but in general) > > Marcus > > > Cheers, > > Doru > > > > > > On 19 Jan 2011, at 11:32, Fabrizio Perin wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> I have a problem with the XMLSupport version from Pharo 1.2. > >> > >> The problem is that I need to work with one of the last version of > XMLSupport but in the pharo image 1.2 is loaded an old version of XMLSupport > (I mean a version from Jan 2010). I did try to load a newer version of > XMLSupport using ConfigurationOfXMLSupport but some errors make this > operation impossible. > >> So either Pharo-dev 1.2 load a newer (possibly the last) version of > XMLSupport by default or Pharo-dev 1.2 should not load XMLSupport at all. > >> > >> I think that doesn't make sense to use by default such an old version, > also considering that the last XMLSupport has nice and useful features like > the XMLPluggableElementFactory. > >> > >> By avoiding to load XMLSupport in Pharo-dev 1.2 by default you let > people free to use the version that they like. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> > >> Fabrizio > >> > > > > -- > > www.tudorgirba.com > > > > "We cannot reach the flow of things unless we let go." > > > > > > > > > > -- > Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de > INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD. > > >
