Cool!
Thanks for this initiative.
Doru I would like to have a plan for SimpleMorphic.

Stef

> We would like to organize a Pharo Sprint on Saturday, February 26 at SCG, 
> University of Berne, Switzerland (room 107):
> http://scg.unibe.ch/contact/maps
> 
> Unlike other sprints, this would not be about fixing things from the tracker, 
> but about building something new and reviewing the situation around one 
> central topic. For this one, the main topic will be Morphic and the IDE. Why? 
> Because it is time to rethink our day-to-day tools and bring them closer to 
> this century (ok, maybe decade :)). It is Ok if you are not a specialist. It 
> is more important to want to participate and learn. The rest will come in 
> time.
> 
> ***** Please let us know by mail if you plan to attend and what you would 
> wish to work on (see below).
> 
> Proposed tasks (other tasks are possible in the same area):
> - Enhancements of Morphic widgets: 
> --- TabGroupMorph with lazy pages, closable tabs, overflow handling and 
> toolbars (a start exists in Glamour)
> --- High level support for collapsable panes (based on the input of Gary)
> --- SearchMorph with multiple groups of items (like in Spotlight)
> --- MorphTreeMorph integrated with GeneralScrollPane to allow for space 
> filling
> --- BreadcrumbMorph
> --- Hyperlinks in TextMorphs
> - Test and enhance the current IDE
> - Evaluate TextMorphs: NewTextMorph, PluggableTextMorph, 
> SMxPluggableTextMorph etc
> - Prototype a new ToolSet solution
> - Enhancements of Glamour and of the Glamorous Toolkit
> --- Debugger
> --- Coder
> --- Multipage Workspace
> --- CodeBubbles
> - Develop WeakAnnouncement (start from the implementation of Lukas)
> - Evaluate the various keybinding implementations
> - Evaluate ToolBuilder
> - Evaluate the path to adopt SimpleMorphic
> 
> A second working topic is getting Monticello faster, but this will only be 
> tackled if there are enough people for the first one.
> 
> Cheers,
> Adrian and Doru
> 
> 
> 
> --
> www.tudorgirba.com
> 
> "Be rather willing to give than demanding to get."
> 
> 
> 
> 


Reply via email to