On Feb 2, 2011, at 2:32 PM, Igor Stasenko wrote:
> 2011/2/2 Janko Mivšek <[email protected]>:
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> One more problem: if some class have a class variable named #Instance,
>> it is not loadable anymore.
>>
>> It seems that problem is in Class>>bindingOf: method, where check is
>> done in a "declared environment", which happens to be a global
>> SystemDictionary, where a class Instance actually exists.
>>
>> This means that no class var with a name which collides with a name of
>> class is allowed?
>>
>>
> The bug is not in the #bindingOf:
>
> it just answers (correctly) that for given name there are already a
> binding exists in system.
> So, it should be allowed to declare the class variable with same name.
> But there are some nuances:
> - what to do if supeclass also defining binding for this name?
> - what if pool dicitonary in (super)class defines binding for given name?
>
> should we allow shadowing of these cases as well, or just for globals?
>
The question is: was this allowed before in 1.1?
Marcus
--
Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de
INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD.
