good points. We will think about that. On Feb 3, 2011, at 11:30 AM, Tudor Girba wrote:
> Excellent news! I agree that the admin should be kept to a minimum. > > It would be good to define the role of the board from the start. One thing > that is important is not just how people get in the board, but also how they > go away. > > I would be interested in getting involved in the board, if wanted. > > Cheers, > Doru > > > On 3 Feb 2011, at 11:17, Stéphane Ducasse wrote: > >> Hi guys >> >> we are filling up papers with luc to get a fondation for pharo. The idea >> there is to have a minimal administrative board: a president that signs and >> a tresaurer that counts. We suggest to be me and luc because he is doing the >> work for the bank ;) >> This admin board should be kept small else at each changes we have to sign >> papers and go to the prefecture and .... >> >> Now we want to have a real board and we would like to hear from you who we >> would like to have on the board. >> For me I would like to get people from industry: >> - adrian >> - johan >> >> then some acad >> - me >> - marcus >> - luc >> >> But we want to hear from you about ideas. We do not want an election because >> we do not want to have election :) >> The goal of the board will be to think and organize ***public*** discussions >> around pharo visions and next steps >> + organization of bounty and money collecting actions >> + infrastructure (paying bills for servers if necessary) >> + collect licenses... >> Stef > > -- > www.tudorgirba.com > > "To lead is not to demand things, it is to make them happen." > > > >
