>> > Maybe the code base is indeed not good enough, not finished (yet).
I think that it is good (may be a bit over engineered -- not sure that having visitors is really necessary) but I think that it is good except that it frustates me immensely that I cannot understand it fast. So I stopped. > Maybe some important abstractions and even functionalities are (still) > missing. > > A couple of lines of comments (like a class comment stating the purpose), the > usual Smalltalk conventions and some unit tests should be the minimum indeed. > > Anyway, things are improving a lot in Pharo, so that is good. > > It is just that it is an enormeous amount of work to write open source code, > publish it, support and document it, you know that too. Yes > > Sven > > >
