Comment #5 on issue 3622 by [email protected]: [ENH]: Clean up Url>>urlClassForScheme:
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3622
I agree with both. It would be more efficient. It would also be more complicated.
My main concern was eliminating a switch statement and applying the open/closed principle as we strive to make the system beautiful.
It seems to me like premature optimization to change the implementation now without pressure from the user side. But I'm just happy it's not ugly any more, so I'll go along with whatever :)
