Iep, in issue 3688 Cheers, jannik
On Feb 7, 2011, at 15:48 , Guillermo Polito wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 3:24 AM, jannik.laval <[email protected]> wrote: > I understand your point :), > Now, with my problem with Network, we can see that some primitives do not > exist in the image of pharo nor squeak. > But are inside etoys image.... > > :3 I smell we need to open a ticket to remove that! > > > Where I think that all these images should have the same primitives, because > based on same VM. > My idea is in that way: how can we maintain primitives and match them with > the vm ? > > Cheers, > Jannik > > > On Feb 6, 2011, at 17:47 , Noury Bouraqadi wrote: > > > I totally agree with Bill. > > > > Noury > > > > On 5 févr. 2011, at 21:40, Schwab,Wilhelm K wrote: > > > >> If there is a problem finding primitives, then that probably deserves > >> attention in the browsers. Given that collections, sockets, streams, etc. > >> all use primitives, will likely continue to do so, and will also find > >> competition (Nile, new sockets package, etc.), I think it would be > >> inappropriate to set up a presumption that all primitives lurk in one > >> package. It cannot (or should not) be enforced, and would interfere with > >> evolution. > >> > >> With respect, -1. > >> > >> Bill > >> > >> > >> > >> ________________________________________ > >> From: [email protected] > >> [[email protected]] On Behalf Of Laval Jannik > >> [[email protected]] > >> Sent: Saturday, February 05, 2011 3:06 PM > >> To: Pharo Development > >> Subject: [Pharo-project] Primitive calls in one package > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> What is your opinion about having all primitive calls in one package ? > >> It would be easier to maintain and to find them. > >> > >> Another question: why all existing primitive in VM have not a method in > >> the image ? > >> > >> Cheers, > >> --- > >> Jannik Laval > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > >
