I asked something similar a while back. I've pasted the contents of that 
discussion below.

Max


--- begin pasted discussion ---

On 13.12.2010, at 09:54, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:

> Guys
> 
> we should create a nice documentation for the OSProcess please please spend 
> some time on the collabactive book because we need more documentation.
> 
> Stef
> 
> On Dec 12, 2010, at 6:34 PM, Schwab,Wilhelm K wrote:
> 
>> OSProcess, which I am learning to like more as I learn more about it, is not 
>> well supported on Windows.  Dave recently advised me to use ProcessWrapper 
>> on Windows; if he is saying that, then it must be the better path for now.
>> 
>> I have done FFI on both Windows and Linux.  I have not (yet anyway) done any 
>> one task in a cross-platform way.  So far, I have not seen anything horrible 
>> that would prevent it.  I have zero interest (at least so far) in moving my 
>> numerical analysis adventures back toward Windows (they started there and 
>> moved to Linux where I am quite happy).  I have a .so interface to Acces IO 
>> A/D hardware and a DLL interface to Ascension Technology's 3D tracking 
>> software.  Ultimately, I hope to be able to use both of them on either 
>> platform (the software exists on both), but have not yet made the 
>> connections.
>> 
>> I transparently use OutputDebugString() on Linux and syslog() on Linux, but 
>> that does a test on platform and calls completely different code, so it does 
>> not count here.
>> 
>> Sorry I can't be of more help.  I urge you to wade into it and ask for help 
>> as you get stuck.  For creating libraries, you might want to have a look at 
>> Code::Blocks; I don't push it very hard, but I have no complaints.  The 
>> "default" is to install MinGW on Windows (last time I looked at least) and 
>> it uses gcc on Linux.
>> 
>> Bill
>> 
>> 
>> ________________________________________
>> From: [email protected] 
>> [[email protected]] On Behalf Of Lukas Renggli 
>> [[email protected]]
>> Sent: Sunday, December 12, 2010 11:43 AM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] Is executing a file platform dependent?
>> 
>> With OS Process you can run scripts. That should work identical on Mac
>> and Unix systems; probably also Windows, but I haven't tried.
>> 
>> With FFI and Alien you can call C libraries. I have not much
>> experience with those, but normally it should be possible to use them
>> on all platforms.
>> 
>> Lukas
>> 
>> On 12 December 2010 17:31, Max Leske <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Hi guys
>>> 
>>> I was wondering if it is true that executing a file from within Pharo is 
>>> platform dependent. I don't actually need to execute a file; it's more a 
>>> theoretical question and I have no idea what the mechanisms are that would 
>>> be used. To give you a clearer picture: Imagine you have C, sh, and perl 
>>> files. What I'm thinking about is that I would have some data in the image 
>>> that I would want to process with the code in one of those files. I would 
>>> then wait for the result and process the result in the image.
>>> 
>>> So my questions are: is there a platform independent way to execute C, sh 
>>> or perl files from Pharo? Does the VM handle the platform dependencies? Are 
>>> there any other issues with the idea I described?
>>> 
>>> Don't go out of your way to find answers, please. But I'd be happy to hear 
>>> your thoughts.
>>> 
>>> Cheers,
>>> Max
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Lukas Renggli
>> www.lukas-renggli.ch
>> 
>> 
> 
> 











On 13.02.2011, at 19:20, Schwab,Wilhelm K wrote:

> I think you will find that OS Process work on mac an Linux and NOT on 
> Windows, but ProcessWrapper does work there.  A test on the OS should let you 
> interchange them well enough to get by.
> 
> Bill
> 
> 
> ________________________________________
> From: [email protected] 
> [[email protected]] On Behalf Of nullPointer 
> [[email protected]]
> Sent: Sunday, February 13, 2011 1:19 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [Pharo-project] Call a external executable file. What is the best    
>   option?
> 
> I need call executable files of OS. I see various options, but I´m not sure.
> I believe don´t understand correctly.
> 
> I need:
> 
>     -Call executable files from system.
>     -Call associated programs of links, for example, I could pass
> 'http://google.com'. The result must be open the default browser of user
> with that link.
>     -Call commands or .BATs files from OS.
>     -I need use that on any OS, must be cross-platform, is very important.
> 
> If that is not implemented on Pharo, is possible create a .exe file with
> another language, where I call functions of OS, and invoke from Smalltalk
> that exe?
> 
> Regards.
> 
> 
> 
> --
> View this message in context: 
> http://forum.world.st/Call-a-external-executable-file-What-is-the-best-option-tp3303894p3303894.html
> Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> 
> 

Reply via email to