On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 8:14 PM, Lukas Renggli <[email protected]> wrote:

> There are 18 other classes in the same hierarchy that follow the exact
> same pattern. I am not sure though if it makes sense to duplicate the
> comment?
>

One way is to put a good comment in one class (GoferOperation ?)  then put
the comment "See GoferOperation" in the 18 other classes.

I've seen in Gofer comment that there's twice:

| ==commit== | Commit the modified specified packages.
| ==commit:== | Commit the modified specified packages with the given commit
message.



>
> Lukas
>
> On 22 February 2011 20:01, laurent laffont <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > Thanks Lukas. Then I propose:
> > I'm a private and internal class to Gofer. I'm a command used to call the
> > class side initializers on all package code.
> > Laurent.
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 7:26 PM, Lukas Renggli <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> This is a private and internal class to Gofer. I am tempted to say
> >> that it is therefor not supposed to have a comment. The single
> >> reference to this class is the method #reinitialize of the public
> >> Gofer API which is commented:
> >>
> >> Gofer>>reinitialize
> >>        "Calls the class side initializers on all package code."
> >>
> >>        ^ self execute: GoferReinitialize
> >>
> >> On 22 February 2011 19:01, laurent laffont <[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >> > anyone ?
> >> >
> >> > On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 8:06 PM, laurent laffont
> >> > <[email protected]>
> >> > wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> Today:  GoferReinitialize
> >> >>
> >> >> Comment Of The Day Contest - One Day One Comment
> >> >> Rules:
> >> >> #1: Each day a not commented class is elected. Each day the best
> >> >> comment
> >> >> will be integrated with name of the author(s).
> >> >> #2: If you cannot comment it, deprecate it.
> >> >> Results: http://code.google.com/p/pharo/wiki/CommentOfTheDayContest
> >> >> Laurent
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Lukas Renggli
> >> www.lukas-renggli.ch
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Lukas Renggli
> www.lukas-renggli.ch
>
>

Reply via email to