On Feb 21, 2011, at 7:04 PM, Eliot Miranda wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 6:05 AM, Juan Vuletich <[email protected]> wrote: > Stéphane Ducasse wrote: > Thanks juan > We will look at it :) > Having a fast and safe transcripter is good. > > Good. At least there one person in our communities is interested on this. > > I am disappointed, as the number of people who actually commented on the > relevance of said TranscriptStream problems, or on how my new implementations > succeeds or fails to fix them is zero. > > Not that I really believed I would "instantly become a hero"... But I can't > understand how nobody else had trouble with the Transcript in the past, to > the point of taking a look at the code, trying it, and commenting on it. > > Igor and I agree. We want TranscriptStream to remain a subclass of > WriteStream, by all means thread-safe (I think the one in the Teleplace > images is thread-safe), and including a log file is fine. But the view must > be separate.
sorry but TranscriptStream was not thread safe else I would not have written threadSafeTranscript. Stef
