+ 1 The method makes _no_ sense at all.
On 26 Feb 2011, at 10:40, Edouard Poor wrote: > I've been thinking about it, and I think I can understand who this came > about, but silently giving a user the wrong answer if they mistype "days" or > write some code like "[ :n | n day ]" (I did this one) seems wrong. If "day" > should only answer with the singular value, than perhaps it should throw an > exception for any values other than -1 or 1. > > I'd actually prefer it just called days, and damn English grammar.
