El dom, 27-02-2011 a las 12:02 +0100, Norbert Hartl escribió: > > On 26.02.2011, at 18:55, Stéphane Ducasse wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Redmine (http://www.redmine.org/) supports sub-projects. Or maybe > > > https://www.chiliproject.org/ (a fork of redmine). > > > > Does anybody has experience with them? > > It would be good to be able to play with them. > > > > > I just want to ask if there are any plans to integrate issue support > in the new squeaksource development. I don't know redmine but it looks > similar to trac I'm using since a few years. I also know jira. To me > one of the biggest gains of these systems is the integration of > source, issues, timeline and wiki. You can easily reference a ticket > from the wiki, a ticket from a commit message etc. In trac it is > #<number> is interpreted as a link to a ticket. In jira it is > <projectname>-<projectnumber>. In jira you can alter the issue tracker > by committing new sources. If you write yourproject-58 into the commit > than you can change the state of the ticket to something like "needs > check" "treated" etc. It sounds a bit blurry but it helps a lot.
Yes, redmine has those capabilities too. And as you said, they are very helpful indeed to automate things. > > > Sad but true biblicello [1] wasn't in place at the right time. I think > it has huge potential by leveraging pier usage. > > > Norbert > > > [1] http://a-bibliocello.gemstone.com/bibliocello/ -- Miguel Cobá http://twitter.com/MiguelCobaMtz http://miguel.leugim.com.mx
