On 16 March 2011 17:07, Torsten Bergmann <[email protected]> wrote: >>as i said.. it is too clever :) > > Yes and as I already noted on issue #3595 relative paths are now > supported but relative means currently "relative to the image location" > since "FileDirectory default" is used. > I think there is not yet a primitive to tell you where the VM is located > and that was the reason to implement it like this. > > But in a typical scripting language paths are relative to > the executable (the VM in this case). > > diamond.exe ../foo.dia
mm. no. Typically a relative paths are relative to the directory where you issued the command line, not relative to the directory where command located. > > So if I build a new scripting language (with a custom diamond.exe VM) > based on Pharo the VM location is required - the image itself could > life elsewhere on the hard disk (given in the ini file for > instance). > > Bye > T. > > > > -- > GMX DSL Doppel-Flat ab 19,99 Euro/mtl.! Jetzt mit > gratis Handy-Flat! http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/dsl > > -- Best regards, Igor Stasenko AKA sig.
