+1 For me 1.2 is stable and robust now we should fix the process but in that case let us focus on 1.3 and start 1.3 dev
Stef On Mar 24, 2011, at 12:40 AM, Igor Stasenko wrote: > Guys, i think you approach to the problem at wrong angle. > Pick any successful Pharo 1.2 build. Declare it as release. Milestone > passed. Done. > > Nobody cares that something gets wrong after, as result of ongoing > development. That the way it goes.. Something got broken, > something got repaired. > > My impression that you just stumbled over insignificant mercantile detail. > Make it perfect on next release. Lets just move on. > > -- > Best regards, > Igor Stasenko AKA sig. >
