Le lundi 21 mars 2011 à 10:17 +0100, Richard Durr a écrit :
> As far as I can see, the only way to call external Javascript is by
> writing Javascript-Code directly into a method like so:
> doSomethingWith: anObject
> {'return SOMELIBRARY.doSomething(anObject); '}
>
>
> is this correct?
No, you can call JS functions with:
#basicPerform: and #basicPerform:withArguments:
Cheers,
Nicolas
> The OMETA based Smalltalk->JS translator seem to let one use st-syntax
> for direct access to javascript like so:
>
>
> doSomethingWith: anObject [
> SOMELIBRARY doSomething: anObject.
> ]
>
>
> and CoffeeScript can use JS seamlessly in the same way.
>
>
> Best regards,
> RD
>
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 7:36 PM, Nicolas Petton
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to share a project I'm working on on my spare
> time: Jtalk
> Smalltalk.
>
> http://nicolaspetton.github.com/jtalk
> https://github.com/NicolasPetton/jtalk
>
> Jtalk is an implementation of the Smalltalk language that
> compiles into
> JavaScript.
>
> Some features:
> - it is written in itself (including the parser/compiler)
> - it is self-contained
> - it compiles into efficient JS code
> - it uses the Squeak chunk format
> - Pharo is considered as the reference implementation
>
> I think Jtalk can be compared to CoffeeScript[1],
> Objective-J[2] or
> Clamato[3], from which it reuses some ideas and code.
>
> Jtalk includes an IDE with a class browser, transcript and
> workspace, an
> HTML canvas similar to Seaside and a jQuery binding.
>
> It is still a young piece of code, and some important features
> are still
> missing/incomplete.
>
> Cheers,
> Nicolas Petton
>
> [1] http://jashkenas.github.com/coffee-script/
> [2] http://cappuccino.org/
> [3] http://clamato.net
>
>
>
>
